Why Printable Clear Aligner Materials aren’t ready for clinical use yet
- Jesper Hatt DDS
- 1 day ago
- 6 min read
Material and Software Limitations
The advent of 3D printing technology has revolutionized various sectors within dentistry, offering unprecedented opportunities for customization and efficiency. In orthodontics, the prospect of directly 3D printing clear aligners promises to streamline production, reduce waste, and enhance patient-specific treatments.
However, despite these potential advantages, printable clear aligner materials and the associated design software are not yet fully prepared for widespread clinical application. This article delves into the current limitations of printable clear aligner materials and the challenges posed by existing design software, highlighting the hurdles that must be overcome before these innovations can be reliably integrated into orthodontic practice.
Sign up for the blog for more insights, tips, and tricks on clear aligner treatments. As a member of the AlignerService site you get notified 1-2 times a month, when we publish new posts.
The challenges of using printable aligner materials in modern orthodontics
Mechanical Properties and Durability
The mechanical integrity of clear aligners is paramount to ensure effective tooth movement and patient comfort. Traditional thermoformed aligners are typically made from materials like polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) and thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU), known for their favorable strength and flexibility. In contrast, many resins used in 3D printing exhibit different mechanical behaviors that may not align with the rigorous demands of orthodontic treatment. For instance, studies have shown that certain 3D-printed resins possess higher flexibility but lower yield strength and elastic modulus compared to PETG, potentially affecting their performance during orthodontic procedures.
Biocompatibility Concerns
Biocompatibility is a critical consideration for any material intended for intraoral use. While some 3D-printable materials, such as Tera Harz TC-85 (Graphy), have received approvals from regulatory bodies like the European Commission (EC) and the Korean Food and Drug Administration (KFDA), comprehensive evaluations of their long-term biocompatibility and safety profiles are still limited. Moreover, the potential for residual monomers or other by-products to leach into the oral environment raises concerns about patient health and necessitates further rigorous testing.
Dimensional Accuracy and Fit
Achieving precise dimensional accuracy is essential for clear aligners to effectively exert the intended forces on teeth. However, 3D printing processes can introduce discrepancies between the designed and actual aligner dimensions. Research indicates that 3D-printed aligners can exhibit increased thickness compared to their digital design files, potentially due to factors like over-polymerization during printing or residual resin remaining on the aligner surface. Such variations can compromise the fit and efficacy of the aligners, leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes.
Aesthetic Considerations
The aesthetic appeal of clear aligners is a significant factor driving patient preference over traditional braces. However, 3D-printed aligners may present challenges in achieving the desired level of transparency. The layer-by-layer fabrication inherent in 3D printing can result in visible striations or opaque lines on the aligner surface, detracting from their visual clarity. This issue underscores the need for advancements in printing techniques and material formulations to enhance the aesthetic quality of 3D-printed aligners.
Challenges with Current Design Software
1. Steep Learning Curve and Limited Clinical Reliability
While digital treatment planning software has evolved significantly over the past decade, it still presents a major barrier for widespread adoption—especially when used for direct-to-print aligner workflows. Today’s aligner software systems are technically robust but often complex and unintuitive, making them difficult to navigate without significant training or experience. This steep learning curve excludes many general practitioners and smaller clinics from effectively using the tools on their own.
Ready to take your aligner treatments to the next level?
Discover expert strategies, step-by-step guidance, and proven methods for mastering aligner orthodontics in our new book, Mastering Aligner Orthodontics. Whether you're using SureSmile, Invisalign or another major aligner system, this book is your ultimate resource for achieving predictable, profitable results. From diagnosis and treatment planning to digital planning with either SureSmile, Invisalign, ClearCorrect or Spark including "how to" guides for every system - it is all covered in the book.
Empower your practice and deliver the exceptional care your patients deserve.
Even more critically, many of the current aligner technicians and AI-assisted protocols behind these platforms are still unable to produce clinically predictable, biologically sound, and mechanically realistic treatment plans. Movements might appear elegant and achievable in a virtual simulation, but the reality inside a patient’s mouth—governed by bone, biology, and biomechanics—can be a different story. Especially when working with more complex cases, treatment plans generated by AI or by undertrained technicians frequently fail to respect clinical limitations such as root control, staging, anchorage, or predictable force systems.
2. Increased Complexity with Printable Materials
Printable aligner materials add a new layer of potential—and complexity. One of the most promising features of these materials is the ability to vary thickness and incorporate design features such as reinforcement bars, pressure points, or cut-outs in specific regions of the aligner. This means that practitioners could one day customize force delivery across different parts of the same aligner, potentially improving control over both crown and root movements.
However, this customization doesn’t come without challenges. Designing aligners in this way shifts the demands of treatment planning to a whole new level. Not only must the clinician or technician understand orthodontic biomechanics deeply—they must also accurately reflect that in the virtual design. The problem? Everything can be made to look perfect on a computer screen. In practice, however, even small inaccuracies in material behavior, fit, or force delivery can completely derail treatment. The more options software introduces for “optimized design,” the more difficult it becomes to predict clinical outcomes reliably—unless supported by precise calibration, high-fidelity simulation models, and robust clinical validation.
This disconnect between virtual planning and real-world results is currently one of the greatest barriers to using 3D-printed aligners safely and effectively.
3. Software Not Yet Designed for Printing
Another critical issue is that current aligner software systems are primarily built around the thermoforming model. They are designed to generate a sequence of 3D models that are then used to vacuum-form clear plastic sheets into aligners. These systems do not yet support design as if the aligner will be printed directly.
In a direct-print workflow, the aligner itself becomes the product—not a mold or model. This means software must offer tools to define and control thickness variation, build internal structures, manage material properties dynamically across the surface, and simulate real-world stress-strain behavior under occlusal and orthodontic loading. At present, very few—if any—commercial systems allow for this level of precision, and most are entirely inadequate for taking full advantage of what printable materials could offer.
Until design software catches up to the hardware and material potential, and until it becomes both more intuitive and biologically grounded, clinicians should approach direct-print aligners with caution.
Environmental and Practical Considerations
Waste Generation and Sustainability
The production of 3D-printed aligners involves the use of resins that, due to their chemical composition, are often non-recyclable. Each set of aligners requires the printing of models, leading to substantial material waste that typically ends up in landfills or is incinerated, posing environmental concerns. Addressing the sustainability of 3D printing materials and developing recycling protocols are essential steps toward minimizing the ecological footprint of aligner production.
Cost and Accessibility
Implementing 3D printing technology for clear aligner production entails significant investment in equipment, materials, and training. For many dental practices, especially smaller ones, these costs can be prohibitive. Additionally, the maintenance and calibration of 3D printers require ongoing resources and expertise, further impacting the feasibility of adopting this technology on a wide scale.
Conclusion
While the direct 3D printing of clear aligners holds promise for transforming orthodontic treatment, current limitations in printable materials and design software present substantial barriers to their widespread clinical adoption. Challenges related to mechanical properties, biocompatibility, dimensional accuracy, aesthetics, software complexity, environmental impact, and cost must be systematically addressed through continued research and technological innovation.
Only with these advancements can 3D-printed clear aligners become a reliable and effective option in orthodontic care.
Sign up for the blog for more insights, free tips, and tricks on clear aligner treatments.
Kind regards
Jesper Hatt DDS
P: +41 78 268 00 78
AlignerService
We are dentists helping dentists create realistic, safe and predictable treatment plans with clear aligners.
Currently more than1500 dental practices in 19 different countries use our service on a regular basis. We offer expert guidance in the following clear aligner systems: Invisalign, SureSmile, ClearCorrect, TrioClear, Angel Aligners and Spark.
AlignerService is a preferred partner of ClearCorrect and TrioClear.
Increase your clinical confidence with complimentary case selection and expert treatment planning support. Within 24 hours an expert dentist will send you an indexation of whether your case i easy, moderate, complex or should be referred to an orthodontist. Try it out today - click the button and follow the instructions.
Comments